Hour Community

My Name Is Rachel Corrie: Becoming Rachel

Becoming Rachel

Photo: Roger Aziz

Montreal tackles the much-hyped biographical play about a martyred activist, My Name Is Rachel Corrie

Adrienne Wong doesn’t usually plead with answering machines for her acting gigs. But after reading My Name Is Rachel Corrie in 2005, the seasoned actress dialled up her colleague at Vancouver’s Neworldtheatre, Marcus Youssef, and left a lengthy message about why she should be considered for the title role. Her unorthodox audition "speaks to the power of this play," she explains. "Reading these words incited action in me, and I think that’s part of its gift. It’s a door opening that you can walk through, so it’s hard to just sit back in your seat."

Wong isn’t alone in her passionate response to this play – it’s also what motivated Neworld and Teesri Duniya’s co-production of My Name Is Rachel Corrie in Montreal, set to open tonight, Dec. 6, at Monument-National. The show consists of emails and diary entries from Rachel Corrie, an American activist whose death made headlines in March 2003, when she was killed by an Israeli bulldozer while trying to block the demolition of a Palestinian home. Supporters like Yasser Arafat immediately heralded her as a martyr. Detractors labelled her naive, if not an outright traitor.

Shortly after her death, Corrie’s writings began to surface in the media. British actor Alan Rickman was one of the millions who read her words over his tea and toast. Emailing from the press junket for his upcoming film, Sweeney Todd, he described the experience. "With Rachel Corrie’s words, it was the power of observation and language that was, ironically, vibrantly alive." Like Wong, he felt compelled to act.

Aided by newspaper editor Katharine Viner and with the Corrie family’s blessings, Rickman moulded nearly 200 pages of the activist’s words into a 70-minute, one-woman show. He also directed the initial production at the Royal Court Theatre, which opened in April 2005 to rave reviews, despite Corrie’s continued status as a controversial figure.

Then, the following February, the New York Theatre Workshop abruptly postponed the North American premiere, citing concerns over political fallout. Rickman cried censorship, and the play became a cause célèbre. In December 2006, the debate landed in Canada when Toronto’s CanStage Theatre reneged on its publicly stated desire to feature the play in its upcoming season. Like a disputed border, the line between the play’s art and its politics now seems to shift, depending on who you ask.

As a result, the play’s reputation arrived in Montreal well in advance of tonight’s debut. "I think there’s an excitement about the piece," admits director Sarah Stanley, "but I’m not sure how much has to do with the play." To combat the hype, she and collaborating director Youssef emphasize a more objective approach, examining "what [Corrie] actually said and what her life has come to mean."

Past productions have taken a traditional tack on the material. The audience meets Corrie as a character and follows her from her childhood in Olympia, Washington, to the Gaza Strip. Along the way, they watch as her altruism morphs into the tragic flaw that propels her toward her demise. Rickman notes, "The narrative is a strong and simple journey: A girl from a secure, small-town background goes to a country which is unknown, dangerous and epic in its implications."

Stanley and Youssef’s version, however, puts two distinct twists on this model. First, instead of choosing another blond, fair-skinned actress to play Corrie, they cast Wong, who is Asian-Canadian. Second, their production highlights the play’s storytelling elements by staging it in the round.

With these artistic decisions, the directors hope to create some distance between the poetic beauty of Corrie’s words and the politically charged events they describe. That way, when theatregoers of all stripes witness Corrie’s many peccadilloes – her messiness, chain-smoking and compulsive list-making, among others – they’ll relate to her as a human being, and ultimately mourn the loss of her potential.

In the end, though, My Name Is Rachel Corrie cannot escape its history, and the Montreal production will be scrutinized just as closely as its predecessors. Even Rachel’s parents, Craig and Cindy Corrie, will be attending the Dec. 9 show and participating in a special panel discussion.

"It’s tricky when I think about her parents," says Wong of reality’s latest intrusion into the play. "I want to be able to approach this performance the way you would approach dancing in your bedroom to your favourite song. So that there’s a freedom in it, a vulnerability and an expression that comes when no one’s watching. The problem is that I want to find that feeling in a place where everybody is watching." (Brett Hooton)

My Name Is Rachel Corrie

At Monument-National (1182 St-Laurent), until Dec. 22

ooo

Becoming Rachel

As Corrie’s legacy lives on through art, Hour gets rare testimonials from her friends and family about the facts behind her death

Crushed to death in 2003 by an Israeli military bulldozer in the town of Rafah, Palestine, located on the southern edge of the Gaza Strip, activist Rachel Corrie has become an international symbol for the Palestinian solidarity movement.

Amidst the violent reality of the Israeli military occupation of Palestine, hundreds of international peace activists have travelled to the occupied territories in recent years, many involved with a global network called the International Solidarity Movement (ISM).

From across the globe, including from Montreal, activists converged on Palestine for a series of protest campaigns based on non-violent direct action between 2002 and 2004.

ISM campaigns focused on issues including the construction of Israel’s "separation barrier," an eight-metre-high concrete wall running throughout the West Bank of Palestine – declared illegal by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2005 – and the arbitrary demolition by the Israeli military of Palestinian homes, numbering 5,000, according to the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions.

Through non-violent protests and direct actions, members of the ISM attempted to confront the daily operations of the largest military in the Middle East, bringing international media attention to the apartheid policies facing the Palestinians, while also placing internationals in the line of fire, the front line on which Rachel Corrie died in March 2003.

Corrie died defending a Palestinian home in the town of Rafah in the Gaza Strip, sparking little response from the U.S. government. In March 2003 I interviewed Greg Schnabel, an activist with the ISM on the ground in the Gaza Strip who was a first-hand witness to Corrie’s death.

"Rachel, I and six other members of our group went to the scene and attempted to place ourselves between the bulldozers and a group of houses in Rafah facing demolition," explains Schnabel. "The Israeli bulldozer approached her from more than 10 metres away. As it finally reached Rachel, it pushed the ground up from beneath her feet, sucking her under the bulldozer," describes Schnabel.

"At this point you could see Rachel struggling to get away. The bulldozer continued to drive forward as we were screaming, then the bulldozer drove completely over her with the blade to the ground, then backed-up and reversed over Rachel once more, then quickly left. We ran over to Rachel and simply held her hand until she lost consciousness and died."

Rachel Corrie’s family in Olympia, Washington, continue to campaign for justice and an independent international investigation. "It’s now over five years since Rachel was killed, and no one thinks about it more than our family," explains Cindy Corrie, Rachel’s mother. "Even though many, many people care, there is still a great deal of misinformation. After a couple of years people assume that it was taken care of, they aren’t aware of the ongoing efforts to seek justice in Rachel’s case."

To this day, no Israeli official, soldier or military unit has been charged or sanctioned for the death of Rachel Corrie, as Israeli military forces continue to occupy the Palestinian West Bank and Gaza Strip. This year marks the 40th anniversary of the occupation, which continues to garner diplomatic support from the governments of Canada and the U.S. (Stefan Christoff)

Posted in

Stage

Share it

  3 comments

  • by Seymour Mayne - December 6, 2007, 10:40 am

    Whatever the theatrical merits of the play, none of its advocates seems bothered by the fact that although the Israelis have evacuated the Gaza Strip, rockets and mortars on a daily basis continue to be fired from there at Israeli civilian sites and habitations. Rachel Corrie may have had good in mind, but where was she when Israeli citizens were being blown up in the hundreds on Israeli’s streets and byways? Why did she not stand up to the Palestinian suicide murderers–and agitate for dialogue and communication between Israelis and Palestinians?

  • by Judy Haiven - December 10, 2007, 8:51 pm

    I am extremely pleased to see that the first Canadian production of My Name is Rachel Corrie is in Montreal. I ask — if the play was first produced in 2005 and had a long run at the Royal Court Theatre in London, UK — why did it take this long to mount it in Canada? As a Jew, I know why. There is an extremely strong lobby amongst the organised Jewish community (i.e. the Can. Jewish Congress among others) who insist that any criticism of Israel amounts to anti-semitism. The silencing applies to posthumous criticism by a young American woman who was deliberately killed by an Israeli-driven bulldozer in the illegally occupied West Bank.

    I am astounded that anyone could defend the actions of Israel’s IDF in mowing down this young woman for standing in front of a Palestinian’s home slated for Israeli state-sanctioned demolition. The fact that Israel has refused to seriously investigate Corrie’s murder and that the US has not any explanation, says it all.

    I am sick and tired of the blackmail by many of my fellow Jews who refuse to criticise Israel and to them I say “not in my name” — what Israel does to the Palestinians is not done in my name. Fortunately, I am not alone: other Canadian Jews are starting to demonstrate and actively opposed Israel’s illegal and brutal occupation of the West Bank, and its re-occupation of Gaza. Our group, Canadians, Arabs and Jews for a Just Peace in Halifax, NS did a “read through” of this play last year on the anniversary of Corrie’s death. It was well-received. I wish I could be in Montreal to see the play — I hope many Jews (among others) go to see it.

  • by Michael Levine - December 11, 2007, 3:31 pm

    I can Go through the the complete history of the land of Israel and who attacked who first but I have to tell you the Imbalance of this play and the the poor imbalanced view of Rachel and her passion for peace was a disaster waiting to happen. She seemed more concerned about those who did not sit at the table for peace? She was not there to defend those innocent souls who where blown up on the streets or at their Seder Tables. As her oh so moral and self righteous where blowing themselves and all those unarmed civilians up! Why did she not advocate peace for both sides? Despite the fact that Rachel’s death and actions where misguided. She still deserves Justice from the Israeli courts. But turning her into a Martyr insights more violence and gives people what they perceive as a cause to kill in her name and more deaths on either side will not solve the issues.

    I pray for peace and fulfilled and healthy lives for all.

    Side note to the writers of this article(Stefan Christoff):
    This year marks the 40th year of defeat of the Arab(Egypt ,Jordan, Syria) attack. THEY invaded Israel from all sides remember? Bent on throwing the Israelis into the Sea!

 Add a comment

Required
Required (will not be published)
Optional