You never know how you’ll react.
The cohabitating exhibitions that just opened at Galerie Clark, for example, couldn’t have been more contrasting in their effect. Greeted by Anthony Burnham’s Overlap and Rewind in room 1, I was surprised. Burnham is well known locally for being one-half of the Flators, an artistic association between himself and Suzanne Déry based on their shared passion for inflated entities. You may have seen their work at Quartier Éphémère last year; their parachute-material structures invade urban spaces with air-filled dominance, a mix of feather-weighted daintiness and overwhelming presence that warps environments. But Burnham as a painter? That was news to me.
The selection displayed numbers five recent painted works. On the right as you enter the room is hidden a small abstract piece, blotches and swatches of colour, pigment globules on a plain background. Nothing particularly subtle or exciting, to be frank, but apparently "a look back on the central concerns of non-figuration, such as the treatment of space and transparency."
The exhibition, says the flyer, is based on the theme of heterogeneity, an exercise aimed at debunking the art world’s need for consistency within an artist’s practice or process. The other paintings shown support this in their disparate relationship: large figurative pieces of a burning building (more precisely The Smithsonian Melting 1865) and a motocross trick jump performed over what looks like a potato field (titled In 1966, a handful of lady racers participated in desert racing, but it was not until 1968 that a large number of lady racers showed up at one event that indicated "the times-they were a changing") contrast in both format and raison d’être with their surroundings. But where on paper this contrast is purported to be contentious, or intellectually stimulating, in practice it is unmoving. The postmodern idea of making representation out of the processes of abstraction is just that, a postmodern concept. Burnham’s use of colour is interesting at times, namely in the case of the piece with the interminable title, which emanates a pleasantly surreal aura, mildly Winnipegian in feel. But Burnham’s stroke is brash and his pigment watery. Also, too much emphasis is put on format, the pieces depending on size for an impact that should come from elsewhere.
Make your way through this, though, to room 2, and you’ll walk into a work that’s unequivocally evocative. The Wild Size, Brazilian Montrealer Marcio Lana-Lopez’s first solo show in Quebec, is a humorous riff on Wittgenstein, a tasty mix of philosophy and rock’n'roll.
The installation fills the entire room, with crooked stairs leading to a tilted platform dividing the space horizontally in two. At the door there’s a short text, something about how the head honcho of a Mexican band called The Maybers (who bears a surprising likeness to Wittgenstein in a sombrero) died tragically and inexplicably in a hotel room that was inordinately filled with vomit. Dancing happily over the line of truth and fiction, the piece invites viewers to enter and to walk on the mezzanine, which represents a distorted rock-show stage, melting monitors and elongated drum kit and all. It’s a disorienting experience, with the visceral simulation of a bad trip; the surface is slippery, and in the space below, left visible in some spots, there lies a recreation of the scene of the crime. The cheesy hotel bed lies filled with disturbingly realistic human discharge, threatening to engulf us if we lose our footing.
It’s a very moving piece.
Anthony Burnham and Marcio Lana-Lopez
Galerie Clark (5455 De Gaspé)
until Feb. 28


4 comments
So we’re supposed to be compelled to go this latest art exhibit because they’ve decided to go the funky trip route? Yeah, thanks..I think I’ll pass. Next please!
Seriously, what are we trained monkeys?! I’ve been to more than my share of art shows over the years and there’s nothing about the context of this one that makes me cream my pants. Look, I realize that attendance to these things is way, way down and that we should all do our part to help out the Montreal art scene but I’m not about to fall for this latest attempt to go all interactive & trippy with us. I effin’ don’t need the annoying frills to appreciate art and I’m willing to bet that I’m not the only one.
It sounds interesting if you’re new to the scene, and for to them I say go with my deepest blessings but for people like myself this sort of thing is just a tad too much. To me this is more frosting than cake.
Hey, I lived through the head-tripping era of interactive art exhibits and let me tell you this display doesn’t sound all that special. Sure, it’s trying and if nothing else we should be proud it’s doing even that but this whole thing seems a bit desperate in it’s execution. There’s a lot to like here but sometimes a lot is too much and that’s the vibe I’m getting from this exhibit. I might be wrong but I won’t be going there to find out if I was or wasn’t. This feels played out.
As i read the article i realized how much effort went into drawing an audience for this show but what i didn’t read was much of a reason to stay. There’s a lot of flashy things going on here but i keep asking myself ‘what about the art?’
It seems odd to me that the promotional aspect of this show outshines the end purpose which I would hope would be to open the public to the arts. Maybe i’m way off but i really don’t see who’s supposed to benefit from all this noise.
Yep, that expo looks pompous, all right. I don’t know about you, but I like my modERn arts to have some sense of actuality, of social relevancy, and I reckon I won’t get that from either exhibits from Anthony Burnham and Marcio Lana-Lopez. What Isa Tousignant finds ‘moving’, I find, why reading this article, sleep-inducing. And, by reading some of the comments on this page, I’m not the only one who feel this way. I mature enough to realize that not all form of art will touch everyone, and that both exhibitions may not be my cup of tea. But, when two showings make you feel so INDiFFERENCE, well, that’s bad news for both the promoters and their artists, isn’t it? So, to whoever will bother to go check it out at Galerie Clark, I trully hope that you will have a nice evening. As for me, I’ll stay home, reading a book… Which will probably be more satisfying.